Do You Want to Understand Your Frustrating Camera and Take Great Photos Today?


Watch this free video to...

  • End the frustration by adjusting just a few simple controls on your camera...
  • Make photography much easier, and look more professional too...
  • Remove all the complication & guesswork from using your camera...

Where should I send your video?

Do you want to understand your camera and take great photos today?

Yes Please


Back in the golden age of film photography, there were plenty of brands from which you could choose some awesome cameras; this debate was a lot less prominent.

Since entering the age of digital photography, the two biggest players have been Canon and Nikon but the question is, as a beginner photographer about to buy one of them, which should you go for?

Before I go any further, I’m not saying that the other brands such as Sony, Samsung, Pentax etc. are no good – you can get just as good photos with them – it’s just that there is a lot more choice with Canon or Nikon.

Also, as a disclaimer, I should tell you that I shoot with a Canon, not that it really matters.

[ExpertPhotography is supported by readers. Product links on ExpertPhotography are referral links. If you use one of these and buy something we make a little bit of money. Need more info? See how it all works here.]

Compatibility Canon Vs. Nikon

One of the biggest reasons why Canon and Nikon are more popular than the other brands is their compatibility with much older equipment.

Canon’s EOS range goes back to 1987 and Nikon’s F mount range of lenses to 1959. This means that you can take any EOS or F lens and stick it on your camera – it’ll work just fine.

The main difference between the two is the autofocus; using Canon, all of the EOS lenses will autofocus whereas, using Nikon, only the AF-S lenses do. If you want your Nikon lens to autofocus (and you probably do), you need to choose an AF-S lens, narrowing your options slightly.

Nikon decided to remove the autofocus motor from their entry level cameras in an effort to keep them lightweight, compact and cheaper.

Currently, the Nikon D40, D40X, D60, D3000, D3100, D5000 and D5100 don’t include motors. Canon, on the other hand, have always had the autofocus motors in the lenses, not the bodies; this isn’t a problem for Canon users.

The lenses over the past 25 years are enough to keep most photographers satisfied but, if you know of any much older lenses that you simply must have on your camera, Nikon is the way to go.

I’ve recently upgraded some of my lenses to Canon’s L-Series and the jump in quality is extremely noticeable, not least in the autofocus.

They both use ultrasonic motors which are exceptionally fast and accurate, providing me with excellent results each time. Older lenses use older motors which are less reliable and don’t perform so well; if you’re looking to buy an old lens, make sure you test it out first.

If you’re aware of the crop factor, you may be interested to know that Canon’s sensors are actually a little bit smaller in their entry level bodies, giving more of a crop.

The crop factor is 1.6 rather than 1.5 so if you put a 50mm lens on a crop body, you’re going to be seeing the equivalent of 80mm, rather than 75mm. It’s not a huge difference but it may be something you want to consider if you buy a lot of full frame lenses.


You may think that this is the most influential factor for comparison but the overall performance of Canon and Nikon is so good that it would be ridiculous to generalise each manufacturer to try and decide which is best.

The best thing to do if you’re main interests lie in the performance of a camera is to compare key factors such as autofocus, noise, megapixels, photos per second and perhaps even weight.

There are areas where Canon stands out where Nikon doesn’t and visa versa.

For example, I really don’t like Canon’s auto white balance but I think their lenses are some of the best around. I think that the Nikon menu system is poorly set out but their cameras seem to handle noise very well.

It all comes down to which cameras are in your price range; Canon and Nikon are constantly in an effort to outdo one other.


In my opinion, one of the most important factors to consider when buying a new camera is the usability.

How does it feel in your hand? What’s it like to shoot with? How easily can you navigate the menu?

All of these questions are answered when you pick up a camera for the first time and, for me, they tend to outweigh all of the other reasons for buying a camera.

When I picked up my first Canon, it just felt right. You shouldn’t be swayed by the style of the little red detail on a Nikon, or the big grey lenses from Canon. You should see what works for you and stick with it.

It’s not often that people switch between brands but, when they do, it’s usually down to the usability because any good photographer knows that they can produce excellent results with basic gear.

Which Brand is Right for You

I encourage you to go into a camera shop with a budget and have look at the cameras in that price range.

Don’t look at the specs to begin with, just pick up a few cameras. See how easy they are to use and what sort of results they give.

My Canon has a really good screen so it’s much easier to review my images; some of my friends who shoot with Nikons have horrible screens in comparison. These small details add up to make a significant difference – let them influence your decision.

Your first camera purchase is really something that should be done in the shop, not online.

A lot of people who get into photography tend to do so because their friends have DSLR’s and they want to produce the same sorts of results.

Your friends will no doubt have at leasts some influence on your decision and try to convince you to buy the brand that they use, and it’s not actually a bad idea.

Buying the same brand camera as a friend means that you can share lenses and flashes; when you go out taking photos together, you end up having twice as much equipment at your disposal and you can lend things to each other all the time.

They will also be able to help you learn how to use your camera.

One of my close friends bought a Nikon and was asking me how to take some of the photos that I’d taken. Although I could tell him how I did it, I couldn’t walk him through it on his camera as I didn’t know how to use it.

Finally, think about what you eventually want to do with your camera and where you want it to take you.

A friend of mine owned a really good Nikon D300 but ended up selling all of his gear and buying Canon instead, all because he wanted to upgrade to full frame.

The price for a Nikon full frame DSLR (D700) was only a few hundred dollars more than the Canon (5D) but it was only 12 megapixels compared with Canon’s 21. The number of megapixels was important to the type of photos he planned to take; if he were to have stuck with Nikon, this would have cost him a lot more money.

When you’ve taken all the factors I’ve listed in this post into account, it’s clear that there’s no real winner, all it really comes down to is personal taste.

I’m sure I’ve missed something and this sort of topic is usually a great source of arguments so, if you have something you’d like to contribute, either leave a comment at the bottom or come over to our Facebook page.

The Great Debate- Canon Vs. Nikon

A note from Josh, ExpertPhotography's Photographer-In-Chief:

Thank you for reading...

CLICK HERE if you want to capture breathtaking images, without the frustration of a complicated camera.

It's my training video that will walk you how to use your camera's functions in just 10 minutes - for free!

I also offer video courses and ebooks covering the following subjects:

You could be just a few days away from finally understanding how to use your camera to take great photos!

Thanks again for reading our articles!


Hey I'm Josh, I'm Photographer in Chief here at ExpertPhotography, and I'm in charge of making sure that we provide you with the best content from the most knowledgeable photographers in the world. Enjoy the site :)

  • Laurens Uijtterlinde

    I’ve never read an article about the Canon vs. Nikon war with a totally objective view, great job!

    For me, I love Canon because they have a much cleaner body. A major plus for Canon is also the fact that they can fix your lenses in record times, something Nikon doesn’t.

    • Ryan

      How could you honestly call this a objective view review of Canon/Nikon? He shoots with Canon, all of his antidotes are negative towards Nikon, or stories are of people switching from Nikon. It’s pretty easy to see which way his swing lays…

      • I’m sorry you think that, but at no point did I say that I recommend Canon over Nikon, in fact, I think I made a pretty strong point that neither one of them was better than the other. I did in fact recommend Nikon though if you want a longer line of lenses to choose from; I simply gave pros and cons for each brand based on the facts. It doesn’t bother me if someone wants to give their money to Nikon rather then Canon; it doesn’t effect the way I shoot or teach. Choose the camera that works for you, whether that’s Canon, Nikon, Sony, Samsung, Pentax, Simma, Lumix, or Leica.

  • keith

    I agree with Lauren thought your comments simply provided info about both nikon/canon systems. I’ve used both canon & nikon over the eons and think they’re both fine.

    Reminds me back in the day my uncle favored chevrolet & dad liked ford. To me they both got you where you were going.

  • Jon

    For me it was my first one, I didn’t have any friends that Took pictures I baught on affordability and usability. But since I have It I’ll probly stick with it… Nikon.. btw

  • Dave

    As a US Nikon user, I have been dismayed that they are no longer allowing ANY discounts over their recommended price because “they don’t want their customers to have to work so hard to find the best price.” So instead they want you to have the worst price. This may lead me to sell my gear and switch. I don’t want to invest more money in a system that is going to cost far more than Canon in the future.

    • Haha, wow, that’s the first I’ve heard of that. It’s almost amusing the way you put it, I can see the advantages, but it does sort of screw the consumer a little bit. I wouldn’t worry too much about gear costing you more in the future, so long as they have the like of Canon around to keep them company, they’re going to have to keep it at least somewhat competitive.

  • Great article. I recently sold ALL my Canon equipment (5DMK1, 50D, L lenses) to switch to Sony. Sony may be jumping into competition. The reason I switched is: in body stabilization, off camera flash ability, and Zeiss AF lenses (85mm f1.8 Zeiss w/ AF!).

    You may want to write an article about DSLRs that are not so popular, but very worthy.

  • Todd

    I am so tired of reading all these “articles” about Canon vs Nikon, only to conclude that both are “great”. It is obvious that both Canon and Nikon are comparable and fantastic brands. However, it would be extremely helpful if you someone were take the time to outline the advantages and disadvantages of the two, instead of giving a general opinion about the “feel” of the camera.

    There are differences between the two brands, and there are situations where one camera/lens is better suited than the other. For example, one is better for studio shoots, while the other is better for action shots.

    All great brands compete! Competition is great for businesses and forces them to innovate.

    Do us a favor and take the time to actually outline these differences!

    • I’m sorry if my opinion is not up to your standard, what would you say for each brand? Maybe there’s a reason there are some many of these ‘articles’?

  • OK Leica and Hasenblad we are talking over $8 to 12K just for a body. Ricoh is prety good on the Pro series that compare with the 7DMK-II or the D810, about We are talking about 3K body. Then is the D4 and 1DX compatables for about 4-7K, Fuji and Olimpus also enter in this run. Then you go quth the comsumer series with the Rebel xSI and the D5100 for about 450-699. Finaly Nikon has the semi-pro series starting with the D90 and D7100 to the D610/750 for 850-2K. There is not a matter of which is better. Lots of super-pros use Canon, lots of them also use Nikon and some use Pentax, Olympus and Ricoh. Well them all are sponsored by the maker of the camera they use. The equipment is not the must important part, is how well you know it and how well you know the principles of photography. It is about what is more comfortable and affordable for you. I am looking to get me a new D750 if I get my photography work to pay for it. I do love Olympus but as with Sony and Leica you then are cut-up on the propitiatory issues.

    Kristian Bogner, world-class pro photographer is a Nikon Ambassador, So are Cliff Mautner, Dixie Dixon, Ron Magill among others. Tamara Lackey is a world-class pro canon user that switched to Nikon in 2012, read what she has to say, The you have others like Scott Kelby who made the switch the other way around. Other well known Canon users are Darren Rowse, and Adam Duckworth, and for what I have reed, their reason for using Canon is the AF function being slightly faster than in nikon. In that case is indifferent to me since I prefer to use manual focusing. I choose Nikon for the ergonomics, I get a better feeling for the equipment and I have shoot with Canon, Leica, Olimpus and Sony as well. However my sons do not share my choise. One uses Canon and the other is a Leica die-hard user. But when we go shooting together they both take aout their mount adapter and use my Nikor lenses, go figure.

  • Carlos

    Too many spelling errors in this article. That makes this article not trustworthy.

  • Pingback: Nikon VS. Canon – Josh Joyner Blog()

  • Dean George

    For the past ten years i am using professional cameras and cam accross these beauties which capture your precious moments brilliantly, so one must have these cameras for professional as well as personal use.
    these are the links below: