Do You Want to Understand Your Frustrating Camera and Take Great Photos Today?


Watch this free video to...

  • End the frustration by adjusting just a few simple controls on your camera...
  • Make photography much easier, and look more professional too...
  • Remove all the complication & guesswork from using your camera...

Where should I send your video?

Do you want to understand your camera and take great photos today?

Yes Please

Why You Should Know What ISO Does

ISO is one of three factors which determine the exposure of a photo, along with aperture and shutter speed. To really get the most out of your photos, you need to know what all 3 do and how you can use them. Read this post to gain a more in depth knowledge of how to use your camera properly and start taking expert photos.


Section 1 – What exactly is ISO?

The ISO (International Standards Organization) determines the sensitivity of the sensor in your camera which, in turn, affects the exposure of your photos. The ISO scale typically starts at 100 and continues to double from this point to the boundary of your camera’s capabilities: 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400, etc. with 1/3 stops in between.

The International Standards Organization are those responsible for setting this widely used standard and all you need to know is included in the information below:

Section 2 – How does ISO affect Exposure?

ISO is one of three determining factors of the exposure of a photo, along with aperture and shutter speed. These two affect the lens and exposure time respectively, with the ISO affecting the sensor (or film). To be more specific, the ISO determines how well exposed a photo will be by changing the sensitivity.

The ISO scale is similar to shutter speed in the sense that, when doubled, the exposure is also doubled; they are proportional to one another e.g. a low ISO number would give a low exposure and a high ISO would give a high exposure – much simpler then aperture.

This is much easier to demonstrate using actual photos as you can see in the slideshow below…

The photos are displayed in the following order: 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200. The aperture and shutter speed remain constant throughout these photos, with only the ISO changing, so that you can clearly see it’s effect on a photo.

The ideal exposure is shown in the fourth photo which was taken at ISO 800.


As you may have noticed by now, nothing affects the exposure in one single way; there are consequences to using different ISO’s.

Section 3 – How does ISO affect the quality of photos?

As a general rule, the lower the number, the better the quality of the photo. By doubling the ISO, you’re effectively doubling the exposure taken by the camera and, in turn, doubling the digital noise. This noise reduces the detail of a photo by making the image appear grainy and uneven.

Lower number = Lower sensitivity = Finer quality photos

To best demonstrate how ISO affects the quality of the image, I’ve taken another series photos and displayed them below. For the purpose of this experiment, I have changed the shutter speed and aperture of each photo rather than simply changing the ISO. This is to give even exposure making it easier to compare the difference in quality.

The photos are displayed in the following order: 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200.


As you can see, the higher the number, the stronger the unsightly noise becomes. There is noise reduction software that can help to correct this but you’ll find that this only really “smooths out” the noise, which can result in an airbrushed effect on faces, reducing the detail in a photo as shown below (cropped to 1% of actual image).

Clearly it has it’s uses but should be used in moderation and with consideration as to what the photo is being used for.

Cameras with larger sensors handle noise better as they allow more light into the photo but, as technology improves, the difference between sensor size and noise is reducing – what used to be a big problem is much less of a one now in high quality cameras.

All cameras are different so I suggest taking yours into low light conditions in order to discover the maximum ISO that you’d be comfortable using.

Enhancing the exposure in post production has the same effect as increasing your ISO, so make sure you get the exposure right in the camera first time round in order to avoid this.

Now that you know what the ISO does, let’s take a look at situations where it might be used.

Section 4 – Which ISO and when?

ISO 100-200: Your photos will have the most detail and the best quality; great for shooting in daylight as there is no need to boost the ISO any higher. Shooting at 1600 in bright conditions would be a waste as this will result in the presence of easily avoidable grain.

ISO 200-400: For slightly darker conditions, such as in the shade or indoors where it is brightly lit.

ISO 400-800: I like to use this range when shooting with a flash indoors as it helps to produce a more even exposure with a detailed background.

ISO 800-1600: Event photographers frequently have no choice but to use this range as live events often happen in low light conditions where flash is not allowed.

ISO 1600-3200: Again, event photographers will use this range for live gigs, but it’s also used in extreme low light conditions where using a tripod is not an option. ISO 3200 is the highest I tend to push my camera to as I’m not a fan of digital noise (grain).

ISO 3200+: This range is reserved for extra low light conditions and artistic effect as, with most cameras, it’s impossible to avoid a grainy result in this range. 

Your Free Quick-Start Photography Cheatsheet

In order to simplify the process of learning photography, I’ve created a free download called The Quick Start Photography Cheatsheet and you can download it below.

Here’s what you’ll get:

  • A downloadable cheatsheet to carry with you as you shoot
  • Detailed summaries of each section of this post
  • External links to relevant articles and blog posts
  • At-A-Glace Images that will explain how each exposure works
  • And much, much more…

Your Free Quick-Start

Photography Cheatsheet

This downloadable cheatsheet gives you detailed summaries of every section of this post, as well as links to relevant articles, and at-a-glace images that will explain how exposure works.

Understand ISO in 4 Simple Steps

A note from Josh, ExpertPhotography's Photographer-In-Chief:

Thank you for reading...

CLICK HERE if you want to capture breathtaking images, without the frustration of a complicated camera.

It's my training video that will walk you how to use your camera's functions in just 10 minutes - for free!

I also offer video courses and ebooks covering the following subjects:

You could be just a few days away from finally understanding how to use your camera to take great photos!

Thanks again for reading our articles!


Hey I'm Josh, I'm Photographer in Chief here at ExpertPhotography, and I'm in charge of making sure that we provide you with the best content from the most knowledgeable photographers in the world. Enjoy the site :)

  • I had no idea about ISO. Thanks for sharing!!

  • Great overview of ISO – you did a great job of explaining it using the photographs.

  • Ben

    This is definitely good to help people learn. I found that with newer cameras, i.e. D7000 and 7D, it is possible to get usable photos using ISO 6400, just takes a but of “Lightroom” touching up, if ya know what I mean 😀

  • CMR

    Thank you for explaining this so clearly.

    It’s not the first time I read stuff concerning ISO but shortly I forgot and when I get my camera I’m still confused about what to use.

    Now I have a much better idea !

  • Brian

    Thanks so much… easy to understand and very educational!

  • Charlene

    Thanks so much….this helped alot!!Easy to understand with your pictures.

  • I often tell people to learn ISO first…before Aperture and Shutter speed…It is so often overlooked and setting between 200 and 800 can make or break a picture

  • Heloisio

    It was very good your exposition.

  • pixelkobold

    Great. Thank you for that. Never thought so intense about the topic ISO.

  • I found this article to be well written. The only additional information I would give would be considered for the “expert only”:

    Depending on lighting situations you will be able to get better Dynamic Range (More information in the very dark AND very light areas of the photo) using specific ISO’s. LowerISO’s are not as sensitive to allow for this in certain lighting conditions, and the inversely for the higher ISO’s.

    The other small tidbit of information I could offer is to not assume that Film ISO and digital ISO will react the same. Even between manufacturers of digital cameras the ISO’s are not a match up. If you are upgrading be prepared for a learning curve.

    The “rules of thumb” above are probably the easiest to keep in mind until you better know how your specific camera responds in any given situation.

  • Elisa Donahue

    Thank you for making it easier to understand the ISO concept. I’m still experimenting with all three, ISO, F-stop and the shutter speed.

  • Finir punktar.

  • A really good article. I used a Canon 5D and could only push it to ISO 800 for decent quality. 100 is my favorite for clarity. I just got the Canon 5D Mark ll and will experiment with the ISOs.

  • David

    One question – you mention that for indoor shots you like ISO 400 – 800 as it gives a more even exposure with detailed backround. When else is it a good idea to bump up the ISO even if you don’t need it.

    Night shot – you’ve got a tripod so shutter speed is not a problem (taking a phto of a still landscape). Would you set it on anything but ISO 100?

    Cloudy day – ISO 100 is possible but would you increase it?

    I’ve got into the habit of having ISO set on the minimum possible with still acceptable shutter speed and aperture for the situation – I realise now this is probably wrong. Auto ISO is an option on my camera. Would you recommend it?

    Love the website. Would love to buy you a pint one day!!!!

    • I’d never use auto ISO myself, it’s a bit too unpredictable for me. Always use as low as you can, but there are reasons where you might want to increase it. At night, I might want a higher ISO, even if i’m using a tripod as it would allow me to capture the image as a faster shutter speed, which I may want if i’m looking to avoid movement. – Josh

      • I tried the opposite of that. Having the ISO at 100, I had the camera on a tripod with the shutter speed at 10 seconds. I also used a remote to start the shot and my picture ended up awesome with absolute no grain. You only need the higher sensitivity if you can’t use a slow shutter speed. Since you were using a tripod, you didn’t have to worry.

        • JoshDunlop

          My argument was that there may still be movement that I wanted to freeze/capture. Babbling brooks, moving cars, grains blowing in the wind, etc.

  • Lori

    Thank you so much Josh. I love your web site. Thanks for sharing all the info. It has been a great help.

  • Regina

    Thanks for the great info. I have always used ISO 100 when I use my flash. I am going to experiment with ISO with my flash. Thanks!

  • rick

    grea tutorial on iso. ow i nderan t better

  • Donald Robitaille

    Great website, very informative. My question involves the ISO settings on the flower pictures. It appears to be daylight, why are the flowers so dark at ISO 100, 200 & 400. This has me a little perplexed. Am I missing something ??

    • “The aperture and shutter speed remains constant throughout these photos with only the ISO changing so that you can clearly see its effect on a photo. The ideal exposure is shown in the fourth photo, which was taken at ISO 800.”

  • Dave

    ISO has nothing to do with exposure in digital cameras. It adds analog gain to the image after exposure similar to the way raising brightness in Photoshop works. Brightness and exposure are not the same thing.

  • iNtervengo

    Josh, ISO doesn’t mean “International Standards Organisation” (with an ‘s’ in English btw) at all. If you go on their website they’ll even explain that in details that the etymology derives from the Greek word ‘ISOS’ which means ‘equal to’ and it’s plain wrong to pronounce it I.S.O. (as an acronym). It must be pronounced in one go as a word. (Actually the correct pronunciation should be ESO with an ‘E’ sound and not an ‘I’ sound). All the rest, good job.

    • John Severin

      I am sorry to inform you but Josh is correct on defining ISO “EYE-so” It the standard that replaced ASA which Stood for American Standards Association. Which some older Photographers still refer to when referring to ISO.

      • iNtervengo

        Hi John, I’m sorry to inform you that you’re in error. Even American photographer Tony Northrup has pointed this out in one of his well informed videos. Tony aside, please go to the ISO’s website and look up the ethimology for yourself and meaning of ISO (when c in this case isn’t an acronym). You’ll find it explained by the I.S.O. association on their website. In addition, as we are not expected to pronounce Nev York (but New York), ISO being a Greek word (ISOS or equal to ASA if n this case), it should be pronounced with an E sound. And since I’m at it so it should the brand Nikon (with an E sound and NOT an ‘i’ sound ) which in the States is pronounced incorrectly 11 times out of 10. The rest of Australia, UK and the very same Japanese (who make it) pronounce it correctly with an E sound. Regards. INetrvengo.

        • Tonna Fuston

          11 times out of 10? And Nikon IS pronounced ‘I’ not E – that is the standard Western pronunciation.
          – Former Nikon Dealer / Assistant to the President of IAPEP (International Association of Professional Event Photographers)

          • iNtervengo

            I don’t truly care how Nikon is pronounced in the USA. Bottom line you guys mispronounce it, get over it. As well as the word ‘via’ you guys pronounce it correctly (with an E sound as it should be in Latin) and the Brits mispronounce it (or better they used to pronounce it correctly and now they don’t using an ‘i’ sound – which is wrong). Plus your former assistant is nobody when compared to Nikon’s CEO in Japan and I assure you, he’s pronouncing it with an E sound. If they don’t know how to pronounce their own product who does…?! American photographers living in Japan, pronounce it correctly for that matter. Dulcis in fundo (look it up), curiously enough in the US the world Nikkor (Nikon’s lenses) is pronounced correctly i.e. with an E sound. Regards, and don’t take it personally. Ciao

          • amanh

            Thanks iNtervengo for the background and pronunciation of ISO and Nikon. You’ve convinced me; I’ll implement your correction in my pronunciation. In the USA, colloquial not professional, I’ve always heard and so pronounced “NIKE-on”. When teaching north-Americans, I advise you to avoid “pronounce with an ‘E’ sound.” Instead say: “pronounce as a ‘short i’ rather than a ‘long i’ vowel sound.” So, correct is NICK-on, not: NECK-on or NIKE-on. (At 16:00 in this video “NICK-on” is how I hear Abbott’s pronunciation. In the USA the difference is subtly distinct between nick-on and neck-on, and quite distinct between nick-on and nike-on.) By the way, north-Americans pronounce via “VEE-ә” (long e vowel sound …as you say, this is the correct Latin pronunciation).

          • iNtervengo

            In many instances, the US use correct spellings and names. This must be pointed out. Realize should be spelled with a ‘z’ for instance (realizzare in Italian which comes straight from Latin – we use 2 for that matter but the Brits seem preferring an ‘s’ every now and then). Indeed Via is pronounced correctly in the US but not in the UK. Mind you that the UK is undergoing a huge transformation with the English language as is being contaminated by different accents now (like the one where the ‘T’ have gone suddenly missing to name one). Soccer was the original British word which the US still uses and the UK has dropped in favour of Football (which in the US is still what it used to be in the UK before). As you can see, there’s a lot out there that undergo distortion unfortunately (as I cannot find a better word to describe this). Interesting enough in the US the word Nikkor is often pronounced correctly (with an E sound as it should be). Talking about Nikon, I hope they dig themselves out of the hole they’re in at the moment as this is an historic brand, one I would hate seeing going away. Take care.

  • Krzysztof Kris

    I doesn’t matter what some people say about the pronunciation of certain words. These words are foreign expressions anyway and there is no way and possibility that all people from all nations and language circles pronounce these particular words in an exactly the same way. If some people say “Nike-on” it’s just fine. Nobody should care. Germans don’t say “ISO” as “ee-soh” or “eye-soh” but as “ee-zoh”. Polish people say “ee-so” (no “oh”). It’s just normal. Even the vowels will be ALWAYS pronounced in a different way because different language work with sounds in a variety of ways. That’s why I believe that talking about the right pronunciation generally makes no sense on an international forum or even when it comes to pointing out to N Americans exclusively by their fellow people and saying they’re wrong about how they speak. Greetings from a Pole living in Germany.

  • Dan Platon

    Plain stupidity. ISO does not stand for I.S.O.
    But passing that what is ISO? No explanation is provided.

    • Alyssa

      Hello, Dan. I believe this question was answered at the beginning of this article. “Section 1 – What exactly is ISO? The ISO (International Standards Organization) determines the sensitivity of the sensor in your camera which, in turn, affects the exposure of your photos.” Is this what you were looking for?

      • Dan Platon

        ISO in photography is not International Standards Organization.
        ISO in photography is A system for quantifying the sensitivity (“speed”) of a photographic emulsion, or a solid-state digital-camera’s image sensor, to visible light.
        You are not aware for what stands ISO and you do not explain what is ISO, you just say that ISO can have different values, that is not an explanation.

        So again plain non expert.

        • Alyssa

          Hi, Dan. The full description of ISO on Wikipedia as you cited, states: “A system for quantifying the sensitivity (“speed”) of a photographic emulsion, or a solid-state digital-camera’s image sensor, to visible light. Normally followed by a numerical value, e.g.: ISO 100 or ISO 64/19°. Developed from the ASA and the DIN systems by the International Organization for Standardization.” ISO was developed from systems created by the International Organization for Standardization.

          If you read this definition and the definition provided in our article they are the same thing essentially. Our article is in layman’s terms so it can be easily understood. Our word order for the International Organization for Standardization is incorrect in the article but it is not so misconstrued that it is indecipherable. We not only explain what ISO is but, there are even explanations for when each value is ideal.

      • Dan Platon

        No, of course not.
        Let simple say ISO is not quite a value, even in the digital word.
        ISO is a spectrum, on film ranging from -2 to +3 exposure value, on digital much more less close to +/- 2/3 EV.
        If we are not speaking of forensic photography it matters to understand exposure, where to place the spectrum regarding the actual lighting situation.
        But here we are at the „expert photographer„ and the very basic information is missing.
        Someone believe that what is stated here is truth and go on, and chimp after every photo.

  • Kelli

    I thought this explanation was great. Who cares who you pronounce ISO or Nikon?? Toe-may-toe/Toe- mah-toe guys. Maybe you need another hobby besides photography & reading blogs to correct people. For those of us who DGAF about pronunciations and just want to take better pictures, very simple and educational. Thanks!!